Join Lefora online for a virtual book launch of The Highway of Spirit and Bone

On Thursday, Nov. 9, from 7 to 8 p.m., Lefora Publishing, with Chuck Radda and David Fortier, will discuss with author Steven Ostrowski his new novel, “The Highway of Spirit and Bone,” the writing and editing process, and the final product.

Follow this link to the Google Meet:

https://meet.google.com/mko-qhbt-cww

Once you get to the meeting, there will be a request for you to be admitted by the session host. Please be patient. You will be admitted shortly.

Regarding the virtual session, it begins and ends at 7 and 8 p.m. There will be time for questions in the last segment of the session.

Steven Ostrowski’s The Highway of Spirit and Bone now available

The Highway of Spirit and Bone

by Steven Ostrowski

 

The novel is about complex family dynamics, the kinds of things that can go seriously wrong on long road trips, and, ultimately, about forgiveness and love.

David has reluctantly agreed to drive his mother, Lilly, from her longtime home on Staten Island to Flagstaff, Arizona. Jeanette, Lilly’s youngest daughter, wants to go on this trip, too, even though she and David tend to bicker a lot.

Along the highways of America, David, Lilly and Jeanette encounter people and situations that are sometimes humorous, sometimes poignant, and sometimes dangerous.

Furthermore, David has reason to fear that back at home, his wife may be enamored of a handsome, divorced neighbor who’s been visiting the house with noticeable frequency since David left.

Steven Ostrowski is a widely-published poet, fiction writer and painter. He is Professor Emeritus at Central Connecticut State University. He and his wife, Susan, live on the Connecticut shoreline, where they raised their three children, Ramona, Benjamin, and Dev. The Highway of Spirit and Bone is Steven’s first published novel.
To purchase, scan the image below.

 

I’m thinking about considering maybe writing…

I had an informal conversation the other day with someone who has been mulling over a children’s story since…well since before Nixon was impeached oh so many impeachments ago. It did not take long to realize that this person was no longer mulling; over five decades the mulling had descended into dodging and shirking and other forms of evasion that masked an unwillingness to try.

Fifty years of gestation..no pregnant woman I know would tolerate that. (Yep, my forty-ninth year—just can’t seem to push that sucker out.)

But it was a frustrating conversation, for both of us probably. I kept wondering what the writer was waiting for, and the writer was lamenting the years of inaction. Eventually we both figured out the truth: the writer was a writer the same way I’m an airline pilot—it’s a nice fantasy, but it’s not happening.

Of course part of the problem here is that writing is hard. We can all fool ourselves and claim we never had the time, or there’s no ribbon in our typewriters, or the ink in our inkwells has dried up—every generation can produce its own justification. But writing demands more than excuses. It’s hard.

But imagine all the authors who would not have been authors if they’d felt that same lack of initiative;

Jane Austen of Pride and Prejudice fame—was dead at 41;

Charlotte Brontë died during pregnancy when she was 38;

On New Year’s Eve when you’re singing Auld Lang Syne, remember Robert Burns, dead at 37;

Much of our understanding of and insight into the Civil War comes by way of The Red Badge of Courage. Its author, Stephen Crane, lived only to see his 29th birthday;

“Lawrence of Arabia,” T./ E. Lawrence, died of injures sustained in a motorcycle accident. He was 46;

The most gifted Japanese writer of the 20th century, Yukio Mishima, committed ritual suicide at 45;

Henry David Thoreau, was one of countless tuberculosis victims, dead at 44.

Then there’d be library shelves bereft of The Great Gatsby, The Plague, “Ode on a Grecian Urn,” Look Homeward, Angel, et al. Not one of these works would have existed because their authors never celebrated a fiftieth birthday.

So get on with it. I mean, thank you for reading this—I appreciate it—now stop reading this and write something. Stop telling people about the idea you have for a book and get some words down on paper. Our life expectancy in 2019 certainly outstrips that of a hundred, two hundred years ago, but there are no guarantees and the clock ticks at the same pace.

Better get started.

A favorite daily read

One of my favorite websites is The Writer’s Almanac with Garrison Keillor. Each day the site provides a poem and sometimes several entries about a writer or some historical event involving some writing of historical significance. For me, a writer, this site provides, dare I say, community, or at the least, a sense of camaraderie. And there are always bits of wisdom and encouragement for all sorts of writers in all sorts of situations.

For instance, just the other day, October 22, 2019, there was an entry about John Gould, a New England newspaperman working out of Maine. One day the principal of the local high school delivered one of his students to Gould. The student had produced a satirical edition of his own, called The Village Vomit. Guess who the student turned out to be?

The Writer’s Almanac is also available in an audio format. Check it out.

Another unanswered question—unanswered

Is it better to tell an old story in a new way, or do we need new stories every time we write?

I mean what was the Great Gatsby but the story of money being unable to buy happiness? We all know that’s true.

What was the Moby Dick other than the story of obsession? Obsession—bad.

The Red Badge of Courage? War is bad also—very bad.

The Naked and the Dead? War is worse than even the Red Badge of Courage said it was.

So then, should telling old stories in the best possible way be the goal of the modern fiction writer? My definitive answer, after much thought and consideration is—I don’t know.

There are days when I’ll look at a morning’s writing and say, wow, that’s pretty good. Nothing shocking but very readable—and I walk away feeling proud. But there are other mornings when I’ll look at the same amount of work, again nothing shocking, and say “that’s been done a thousand times..today alone…and better.” Delete, start again.

Despite my own indecisiveness, I do believe there’s nothing new under the sun, or very little that’s new. It then becomes incumbent upon the writer—whether he is producing fiction or non-fiction, novels or essays, to convey what he wants for his reader in the best possible way for that particular genre. There is no blanket prescription.

That’s twice I’ve copped out, so let me explain. There are chapters in Moby Dick that are virtual how-to manuals for running a whaling ship. In Gatsby though, mystery surrounds the main character, and even if we wanted to use James Gatz as a role model, we wouldn’t know how.

We need to adapt a good deal when we tell a story—to be able to pull back before the reader says “get on with it” and be able to satisfy the reader who wants more. The more good literature we read, the better our chances of effecting that skill.

Near the end of Hawthorne’s Scarlet Letter the narrator implores his reader to be true, be true, be true: such a simple philosophy may be the best advice for a writer also. Tell the truth…but if you can utter that truth in some new and imaginative way, all the better.

Lessons from Vonnegut, Part 3 

David Fortier

There is a message in there somewhere for us writers—not would be writers: writers—about sticking to our task, connecting with those who can help us improve (not perfect) our craft—whether it is from a family member (his first wife said that she felt it in her bones that Vonnegut was meant to be counted among the best and did what she could to support his efforts, from typing up manuscripts and keeping the books) or from other professionals, even to the point of taking creative writing classes, and while there is no evidence from the Wakefield piece that Vonnegut ever belonged to writers group, joining an active writers group. 

I suppose it is a matter of whatever works as long as it appears to be working for us. 

On another note, in Vonnegut’s case, having some New England experience in his blood might have only helped. Of course, he was not born here, but he did reside on Cape Cod for many years, and I am thinking that some of that good old New England stick-to-it-iveness got under his skin. But then, that’s only me. 

For those of you with manuscripts close to sharing, please consider submitting to Lefora. Look for our submissions schedule on the submissions page of our website. 

Part 1

Part 2

Lessons from Vonnegut, Part 2 

By David Fortier

  What I learned from Wakefield about Vonnegut. 

  1. Many of his early attempts were rejected.
  2. When they were rejected, as was the tenor of the day, he received valuable feedback from editors who were took an interest in his submissions, and when he received this feedback, he followed an editor’s advice.
  3. Vonnegut followed up on leads, including networking, with old college classmates.
  4. Vonnegut, at one point, sought the services of one of those manuscript doctoring outfits, but did not have the money to contract with one.
  5. Having followed up with old classmates and having received a detailed critique of his submission, Vonnegut would apply the appropriate fixes and resubmit; to which he often received a second critique which he set to work on.
  6. He worked on his fiction weeknights and weekends.
  7. Even when he followed up on fix after fix and the piece was ready finally submitted to the publisher, there was no guarantee that the piece would be published. This did not stop Vonnegut from continuing to work on a piece and resubmitting it elsewhere. In not a few instances, a story that he started on one year might be published three years later.
  8. He was not above working on salable stories. In fact, when his stories started getting picked up regularly, he made a deal with himself that as he made more money writing stories than at his day job, he would leave his day job. Which he did. Which worked, until it didn’t, as the venues dried up with the advent of TV.
  9. When the time came, his editor friends handed him off to an agent, who pushed Vonnegut harder to write salable stories.
  10. Vonnegut had a supporting cast, from his first wife to his dad. The latter pasted the letter in which Vonnegut shares his vision—of leaving his day job—on Masonite and covered them over with varnish to memorialize them.
  11. When the short story market dried up, and before he hit it big with Slaughterhouse-Five, Vonnegut once borrowed $300 dollars from his son, who made the money on his paper route.
  12. Vonnegut was appreciative of all the help he received, especially from his editors. In a letter about the role of creative writing courses, he says in so many words, creative writing instructors have always been with us, in the form of those editors.

Part 3

Part 1

Lessons from Vonnegut, Part 1 

By David Fortier

Kurt Vonnegut Complete Stories, Collected and Introduced by Jerome Klinkowitz & Dan Wakefield, Foreword by Dave Eggers, is a treasure for writers like me, and I am hoping, for writers who one day will submit to Lefora. I will get to my reasoning in a moment. For the time being, I confess I would not have gotten to it myself if it hadn’t been for my Fiction Masters class at the high school where I teach English. This honors-level English class features Shelley’s Frankenstein, Voltaire’s Candide, James’s Turn of the Screw, and most recently Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five. 

Taught in the spring of their senior year, the course is a gift both to me and to my students. In many ways, it liberates both of us from the high school thing. They are heading out into the world—which means new horizons on a college campus of their choice; I get to  send them off by giving them a taste of what being in a college classroom might be like. For this semester, together—the students, Vonnegut, and I managed to keep the infamous and mind-numbing senioritis at bay. 

It helped that a good handful of the students are curious. Curiosity about the world among young people appears to have been kept at a distance from them. This curiosity spilled over to the book—one has read it and would love to read it again, but without the typical and cumbersome high-school treatment that would ruin it for him.  

This high-school treatment thing is something that I have been trying to get my head around for the past 15 years or so: why is it that kids come to high school hating to read, and, no, it is not because they hate to read, period; it is because they hate to read for school. 

As it turned out, I had two large classes of seniors, but not enough copies of the book to go around.  Rather than tossing in the towel, I visited several branches of my local library where I found four copies of Slaughterhouse waiting for me on fiction shelf. 

Alongside the books was this 911-page tome of Vonnegut’s short stories. I opened the table of contents. I recognized a few titles. I could not say that I was familiar with many of them. I saw Dave Eggers, a favorite of mine, provided a preface. Despite having little to no time, to get through the book, I managed to talk myself into taking the book with me, so that I could read what Eggers had to say. Maybe, I just might get to a few of the stories. 

When I did get to the book, it was already overdue. Eggers had some nice things to say about Vonnegut. I read a few of the stories. What turned out to be the biggest surprise, though, was Wakefield’s short essay, “How Vonnegut Learned to Write Short Stories.” The Vonnegut we know today, Wakefield contends, is not the early Vonnegut who labored over his stories while working full time. It is this subject, Vonnegut as apprentice, that is most helpful to those of us who aspire for publication to begin to understand and experience. 

If it weren’t for having to teach Vonnegut to some seniors on the verge of senioritis, I would not have stumbled across this helpful material. 

Part 2

Part 3

Game of Thrones was really about story-telling

There is much to be gleaned from the final episode of HBO’s Game of Thrones, but the speech of the dwarf Tyrion Lannister resonates more than any other words or deeds. In a sense he was telling us why we watched the show and why it was important to watch it, irrespective of the magnitude and spectacle.

Tyrion, still grieving over the death of his brother, stood above the ashes of a slaughtered city with a death sentence on his head and the self-knowledge that he had been wrong about so many things, and delivered what was, in fact, the message of every writer:

“What unites people?” he asks the representatives gathered to decide his fate. “Armies? Gold? Flags?”

And he pauses, because he knows it is none of those, then continues.

“Stories,” he says. “There’s nothing in the world more powerful than a good story. Nothing can stop it. No enemy can defeat it.”

We all have them—stories, that is. And if they don’t rise to the level of deciding the fates of millions, they at least give life to ourselves, our forebears, our descendants.

Game of Thrones took on a life of its own as vast as the battles it comprised, and today people are arguing over the validity of its ending. Some are angry, others are disappointed, but me? I’m grateful for having been given the role of observer in a narrative of such scope. Someday when the specifics of the families have faded, when we vaguely remember Starks and Lannisters and wonder aloud weren’t there dragons too?—then the story—and the fact that there was a story—will still unite us.

And to those who who complain that the series did not end the way they wanted it to, spoiler alert: life is like that also.

Did You Ever See A Horse Go By

Front Five

In Did You Ever See A Horse Go By? new author Frank DeFrancesco invites the reader into his personal tug-of-war and ultimate triumph over the psychological and sociological restraints that immobilized him for half a lifetime.

The author uses biographical events, old letters, unpolished poetry, and excerpts from his journals along with a few fictional composites to recreate memories and moods.

DeFrancesco pokes fun at his own naiveté, self-doubts, and Catholic guilt, as well as clueless therapists, Rome adventures, Woodstock, discos, and “dead Bob” to weave a compelling story that balances seriousness and sadness with humor and joy.

“While I’m not sure the world really needs another coming out story,” DeFrancesco says, “I feel deeply the need to tell it.”

Click on the book cover to order your copy of Frank DeFrancesco’s memoir, “Did You Ever See A Horse Go By?”

Also available at

Amazon.com

FastPencil.com

Frank

Frank can be reached at fdef@sbcglobal.net

Frank blogs at http://reluctantrebel.blogspot.com/